Results of public feedback received on the Income Tax Amendment (No. 3) Bill 2016

12 October 2016

The Ministry of Finance (MOF) has, on 3 October 2016 accepted for implementation 22 of the 48 suggestions on the draft Income Tax (Amendment) (No. 3) Bill 2016. The suggestions were received during the public consultation exercise held from 8 July to 29 July 2016.

According to the MOF, the remaining suggestions were not accepted for implementation as they are “inconsistent with the policy objectives of the proposed legislative changes”.

Key suggestions received that were accepted by the MOF where they will be incorporated into the upcoming Income Tax Amendment Bill are summarised as follows:

  • Business and Institute of a Public Character (IPC) Partnership Scheme (BIPS)

Currently, there is no definition of what constitutes “employee’s working hours” for the purpose of determining expenditure that qualifies for 250% tax deduction. In this regard, the Bill will be amended to allow salary expenditure attributable to the period of time-off given to employees for services performed outside working hours to also qualify for tax deduction under BIPS.

  • Specific anti-avoidance mechanism introduced for writing down allowances on intellectual property rights (IPRs) transfers

When IPRs are acquired by instalment payment, the open market price refers to the price in which those rights could have been purchased in the open market at the time of the signing of the agreement. However, when IPRs are not acquired by instalment payment, the open market price is the acquisition date of the IPRs, which is defined to be the date on which those rights are assigned to the company.

Hence, the definition of acquisition date of IPRs under section 19B will be amended to ensure consistency in how the open market prices of IPRs are determined across the different payment arrangements.

  • Allocation of pre-commencement expenses to income streams assessed under different tax rates

Section 14Z of the ITA will be amended to make it clear that the allocation of pre-commencement expenses applies to both sets of expenses pre-commencement expenses incurred before the deemed date of commencement of business under the concession for enterprise development, as well as expenses incurred after the deemed date of commencement of business but before the business earns its first dollar of business receipt.

  • Tax deduction of up to 200% for issuance costs attributable to retail bonds issuances

Section 14ZA which accords a tax deduction of up to 200% for qualifying expenditure incurred on qualifying issuances (i.e. an issue of qualifying debentures from 19 May 2016 to 18 May 2021, or making available debentures for secondary trading within five years from their issue), will be amended to make clear that qualifying expenditure for qualifying issuances, for which a tax deduction of up to 200% can be claimed, must be incurred on or after 19 May 2016.

Amongst the suggestions rejected were:

  • Specific anti-avoidance mechanism introduced for writing down allowances on intellectual property rights (IPRs) transfers

Suggestion to treat transactions between unrelated parties as having taken place at open market prices was rejected as the introduction of an anti-avoidance mechanism for IPRs transfer is to ensure that writing-down allowances under section 19B are granted based on transacted values that are reflective of the open market prices of the IPRs regardless of whether the transaction occurs between unrelated or related parties.

  • Introduction of a definition for income support payments (ISP) derived by REITs

Suggestion to expand the scope payers of ISP to include related party of the seller to take into account situations where a related party of the person who sold the property to the trustee of the REIT is a payer of the ISP was rejected as there is a provision to allow Comptroller of Income Tax to approve any person to be a payer of ISP.

For further details, please refer to the MOF’s website.

Source: IRAS, MOF

Results of feedback on draft Income Tax (Amendment) Bill 2016

24 November 2015

The Ministry of Finance (MOF) has, on 17 November 2015 accepted for implementation 31 of the 70 suggestions on the draft Income Tax (Amendment) Bill 2016 (formerly know as the Income Tax (Amendment) Bill 2015). The suggestions were received during the public consultation exercise held from 26 June to 24 July 2015.

According to the MOF, the remaining suggestions were not accepted for implementation as they are “inconsistent with the policy objectives of the proposed legislative changes”.

Key suggestions received that were accepted by the MOF where the Income Tax Act will be amended are summarised as follows:

  • Enhance the Double Tax Deduction (DTD) for Internationalisation scheme: In situations where an overseas entity bears the manpower expenses but subsequently recovers the salary cost from the Singapore entity, it is not clear if such recharges qualify.
  • Introduction of the International Growth Scheme (IGS): Current definition of “international growth company” does not include a company in Singapore that performs services to persons that are domiciled outside Singapore.
  • Extension and enhancement of the Maritime Sector Incentive (MSI): The proposed amendment to the definition of ‘international shipping enterprise’ should specify the minimal stake (i.e. the shareholding requirement) that the Singapore resident company should hold in the SPV in order to qualify as an international shipping enterprise.
  • Amend the provisions relating to implementation of Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA): Ambit of subsection (2) of the draft section 105PA is very wide (i.e. the duty to provide information prevails over any duty of secrecy “whether imposed by written law, rule of law, any contract or any rule of professional conduct”) and could potentially cover common law legal professional privilege.

Amongst the suggestions rejected were:

  • Extension and refinement of the Mergers & Acquisitions (M&A) scheme: Unlike the other paragraphs under section 37L(4A), the proposed paragraph (d) does not specify a period of acquisition within which the acquisition of ordinary shares in a target company (by the acquiring company or an acquiring subsidiary) will qualify for tax deductions under the M&A scheme.

MOF’s response: The purpose of the insertion of paragraph (d) is to specify that any acquisitions made by an acquiring company (or its acquiring subsidiaries) can qualify for the M&A scheme, so long as the acquisitions are made within the same basis period when the acquiring company (and its acquiring subsidiaries) own more than 50% of the total number of ordinary shares in the target company. As companies have different basis periods, it is not meaningful to specify a date in paragraph (d).

  • Enhancement of the Double Tax Deduction (DTD) for Internationalisation scheme: The definition of “overseas establishment” requires a direct association between the Singapore firm or company, and the overseas establishment (e.g. subsidiary). This may be too restrictive, and the definition should be amended to include other entities that are not subsidiaries of the Singapore firm or company.

MOF’s response:  Current definition already allows for an overseas entity that is not a subsidiary of the Singapore firm or company to qualify for the DTD scheme. There is no requirement for the overseas entity to be a subsidiary of the Singapore firm or company. The overseas establishment must be approved by IE Singapore.

  • Extension and enhancement of the Maritime Sector Incentive (MSI): Proposed new definition of “finance leasing” seems to suggest that there is a finance leasing of a container as long as there is a substantial transfer of obsolescence, risks, or rewards incidental to ownership of the container. Suggest replacing the word “or” with “and” in the definition of finance lease, to make clear that there is a finance leasing only if there is a substantial transfer of obsolescence, risks and reward.

MOF’s response:  The definition of finance leasing is aligned with that used in other sections of the Act (e.g. sections 10D, 13S, 43Y and 43ZA). MOF will also review the definition of finance leasing when the new Financial Reporting Standard on leases is released by the Accounting Standards Council.

For further details, please refer to the MOF’s website.

Source: IRAS, MOF